<
PREVIOUS LETTER ||
NEXT LETTER >
Dear Breakup Girl,
The story starts out fairly simply. Boy meets girl. Boy goes out with girl.
Happy, loving relationship develops between boy and girl, and continues for (at
last count) almost three years. Boy and girl laugh together, are silent
together, and generally love being together.
BUT this is the first relationship for said boy (even though both are
meandering through their mid-twenties at this point). And so, although boy and
girl have discussed the kind of wedding they would like, the kind of marriage
they would like, and the ways they'd like to raise their children, they have
made no moves in that direction. Although they have agreed that they WOULD
marry each other, they have never determined that they WILL do so. In fact,
just last week, the boy said with great confidence that they WOULD eventually
breakup, not because of any deficiencies in the relationship, but simply
because it was his first, and it would be unwise to commit to one's first
relationship.
This leaves girl in an awkward position...
I've tried the "porch test" and
can't imagine myself with anyone other than this boy. But I don't want to let
three years stretch into five, and then ten, and never move the relationship in
any direction. I do ultimately want to get married ... not now, but someday. I
want kids somewhere in that time frame, too. And right now, the only visible
obstacle to moving in that direction is that the boy of choice hasn't done as
much window shopping as he'd like.
There was a time when I would've thought that was pretty lame. But friends
who ARE married -- who got married in spite of it being that boy's first
relationship --are now experiencing major trouble. They are really
struggling. And while I don't think it being a "first relationship" is
insurmountable, I do have to recognize that it's an issue. And when mid-life
crisis time rolls around, it could be an even bigger one.
I've suggested seeing other people, so boy can discover whether he really
loves me or just loves having a girl around. He's not interested in seeing
anyone but me. I've suggested breaking up now, rather than dragging things on
any longer if he KNOWS that marriage isn't an option for us, but he doesn't
want to do that either. And he's not willing to take a chance on the
relationship without having dated others.
Where do I go from here? I'm happy in the relationship, and would like it to
continue. But I don't want that at the expense of a more long-term relationship
in my life. It seems silly (not to mention agonizingly painful) to break up
with someone I still want to be with. It seems equally silly to keep dreaming
about a future with someone who has very bluntly stated that it's not going to
happen. HELP!
--Lee
Dear Lee,
Let’s say you’re in med school. A really
good
med school. You love med school. Not everyone gets such a challenging
but wonderful opportunity, and you don’t go a day without appreciating
that. Med school is great.
But actually, you want to be a lawyer. You do not want
to be a doctor. You feel ridiculous throwing away this amazing situation
-- and
boy oh boy will you miss everything about it -- but at the end of the
day/eight
years, will it get you where you want to go?
Boyfriends are not careers, I know (certain "mergers"
notwithstanding). And I am not telling you unequivocally to leave this guy.
I am just trying to illustrate why it would not be ridiculous if you did.
If you’d written to say, "Neither of us finds
planning
on marriage relevant in the first place, so we’re completely content as
is," …well, you wouldn’t have written. But Lee, what you have here
is the kid-free version of "s/he wants to have kids, and I don’t." If
someone
tells me that at the end of the day/child-bearing years, s/he wants kids more
than a (that) partner, I say – in gentler terms -- go where you can
get the kids! If you want that "law degree"/life partner, it’s perfectly
fair to go where you can get that.
Easy for me to say, I know. Well, actually, it’s
not. I mean, I really, really want this guy to be a Tiler:
committed in all forms except verbal promises for the future – but, once
left to his own devices, steady and solid as grout. While there’s plenty
of historical/high-school-sweetheartical precedent for The One being the Only
One, it’s not unreasonable -- nor unwise -- for him to want
what he wants, either. I’m not convinced that either waiting or pushing
or ultimating can
– or should – change his mind or, verily, the facts: he
doesn’t
plan on marrying "his first." Also, what you didn’t say is "What
if…?"
You didn’t say, "What if I’m throwing away something that
would
work out and become permanent, with just a little patience and elbow grease?"
You basically said, "Well …I can see what he means."
Finally, I know you can’t imagine anyone else
with
you on that porch. But that’s not quite how the test works. It’s a
guide to see whether or not you could envision yourself with a particular
person,
not a challenge to see if you can force the image of someone you don’t
even know yet to jump Gump out of nowhere into this guy’s rocker.
So again, I’m not saying you have to bail
yesterday.
But you don’t have to wait for breaking up to be okay with him, either
(see your second to last paragraph). (Also, if "seeing other people" is going
to work in this case, they can’t be just, like, a side of fries.) This
is a reeeeeeeal tough one, Lee, I know. That’s why I’d let your
inner
lawyer handle it.
Love,
Breakup Girl
<
PREVIOUS LETTER ||
NEXT LETTER >